|

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Dee Buchanan
August 10, 2009
(202)
225-3484
Hensarling, Kaufman
Residents Discuss Health Care Solutions
Hensarling
Opposes Government Takeover
KAUFMAN – Congressman Jeb
Hensarling discussed solutions to our nation’s health
care crisis with
Kaufman
County residents on
Monday, less than two weeks after a key House of
Representatives committee approved legislation that
could set the stage for a government takeover of your
health care.
Over 100 Kaufman residents joined Hensarling at
the Kaufman County Courthouse Annex to discuss this
critical issue.
“Many of the
solutions to our most challenging health care problems
can be found in places like Kaufman and Forney rather
than in
Washington,” Hensarling
said. “I was
encouraged by the feedback and solutions I heard from
patients today.
There is no doubt that we must fix health care in
our country. I want to ensure that you can have access
to the health care you need, when you need it, and at a
price you can afford.”
Hensarling opened the meeting by
discussing his principles for health care reform.
When he served as Chairman of the Republican
Study Committee, Hensarling commissioned a Health Care
Task Force to develop a patient-centered health care
reform plan.
The task force developed the following principles
that guide Hensarling’s approach to the September
showdown on government ran health care: 1) Every
American, regardless of health or financial status,
should have access to affordable health care coverage of
their choice.
Nobody should go bankrupt because they get sick;
2) Health care in America should be family-focused and
patient-centered. It must put patients, in
consultation with their doctors, in control of their
health care.
Your health care decisions should not be made by
your employer, a health care plan selected by your
employer, or the government; 3) People should own and
control their health care plan, and it should be
personal and portable; 4) Americans who are happy with
their current plan should be allowed to keep it; 5)
Forcing Americans into a government health care program
will not solve America’s health care challenges.
“Every
American—no matter how sick they are and regardless of
their financial status should have access to health
care” said Hensarling.
Americans should
know that if they get sick, they can get the care they
need, when they need it and that they won’t go bankrupt
in the process.”
Hensarling also discussed the
evidence out of the Harvard School of Public Health
indicates that 9 in 10 Americans believe their existing
plan meets their projected health needs.
He said,
“While many East
Texans need access to care, those who are happy with
their current plan shouldn’t be forced to give it up.”
Hensarling followed with an
overview of what drives up the cost of health care,
making unaffordable for too many Americans.
He said, “Health
care is expensive in America because there is so much
waste, fraud and abuse associated with it.
That’s what happens when the government and
insurance companies make too many decisions about your
care. I’ve
voted for reasonable medical liability reforms that the
American Medical Association has noted could save
between $70 billion and $126 billion in one year alone.
There’s something wrong when it’s easier to sue
the doctor than it is to see the doctor.
This is just one example of how we can cut costs
and improve care.
We should focus on things like preventative care,
wellness programs and medical breakthroughs.”
The discussion then turned to a
review of the health care plan offered by Washington
Democrats.
Hensarling praised them for sharing his goal of
quality, affordable health care for all Americans, but
questioned the ultimate results of their proposals.
“If you like the way the government is running our
banks, our mortgage companies, AIG and General Motors,
you’ll love their takeover of your health care,”
said Hensarling.
Hensarling stated, “Congress
needs to remember the Hippocratic Oath when crafting a
plan – ‘first do no harm’ said Hensarling.
“I am
cautious about the proposals I have seen because 1)
bureaucrats would stand between doctors and patients in
the exam room, 2) they will delay treatment and produce
lower quality care for East Texans and 3) they would
force 120 million Americans out of their current health
care plan.
Hensarling talked about the
difference between patient-centered health care and a
government takeover.
He said,
“Frankly, I’d prefer to trust the opinion of a
physician, with their years of training rather than a
government bureaucrat when it comes to the care my
constituents and family receive” said Hensarling.
“And when
it comes to prompt treatment, I cannot imagine what it
would be like for my wife and me to wait on a bureaucrat
to decide when – or if – one of our children can receive
a treatment that a doctor has ordered for them.
To watch my children suffer as we wait for
government approval would be too much to bear.
I have serious
concerns about the quality of care in a system that
prioritizes controlling costs over providing care,”
said Hensarling.
Hensarling also addressed a growing
concern of many older Americans whose decisions about
end-of-life treatment could end up in the hands of a
Washington
bureaucrat. He said,
“Frankly, I’d be worried. Patients and their families
should make the ultimate decisions about how end-of-life
care is delivered, not a bureaucrat who doesn’t think a
treatment such or a test is ‘cost efficient’.”
Hensarling praised the
accomplishments of American innovation in health care
and expressed concern about the chilling effect a
government takeover would have on new treatments.
“As a
result of American breakthroughs, we lead the world in
access to technologies like MRI’s and allowing those
afflicted by diseases like cancer to enjoy a higher rate
of survival than our European counterparts.
A government takeover of health care will stifle
these inventions that have made us leaders, leading to
less choice and fewer treatment options for our parents,
spouses and children.”
Congressman Hensarling added, “There
is a fundamental decision being made in this debate
over who will control health care in
America.
Will it be parents, families, and doctors?
Or will it be
Washington
bureaucrats or insurance company accountants? I am ready
to work together with colleagues on both sides of the
aisle to deliver a health care program that works – but
I cannot support a system that emphasizes cost over
quality and chooses the opinion of the government over
that of the physician.”
###
|